Showing posts with label Race relations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Race relations. Show all posts

Monday, December 21, 2009

Confederate Indian Treaties: Promising more than it could deliver

Here are some excerpts from "The implementation of the Confederate Treaties with the Five Civilized Tribes" by Kenny A. Franks (The Chronicles of Oklahoma, volume LI, Number 1, Spring 1973). The article takes a close look at the efforts of Albert Pike to develop a sustainable policy toward tribes. Pike was a native of Massachusetts and Brigadier General in the Confederate Army.

In a period of federal expansion, pre-existing governments presented a problem for those who were inspired by manifest destiny. Therefore tribes had to be re-defined as a collection of individual wards of the state, rather than self-governing nations. In contrast, tribal sovereignty was more consistent with the Confederacy's views on States' rights (as long as you weren't a Cherokee living in the middle of Georgia, thanks to Andrew Jackson) but more practically, the recognition of tribal governmental power was a method of cementing an alliance on the sparsely populated but chaotic frontier.

Albert Pike, the man responsible for the success of the Confederate efforts to gain alliances with the Five Civilized Tribes, was fully devoted to the betterment of the South's Indian wards. In August, 1862, he forwarded an eleven-point program to President Jefferson Davis designed to carry forward the good relations which had been established with the Indians. (p21)

The treatment of the Indian troops and the supply system of the Confederate army also was discussed. Pike advocated the immediate dismissal of any officer who seized supplies en route to Indian Territory, and the direct shipment of all monies allocated to the Indians to the officials responsible for their distribution. ...Pike likewise prodded the Confederacy to honor claims for supplies which had already been provided by the Indians. (p22)

Thus the man who had done the most to gain Southern treaties with the Five Civilized Tribes proposed a program which was designed to ensure the success of the relationship. Just how much the Confederacy was to ignore Pike's advice can be seen in the early attempts at implementing the treaty stipulations. Though the programs outlined for Indian Territory were well organized and developed, they never were adequately initiated and maintained. All of the agreements called for the furnishing of Indian troops for the protection of Indian Territory. These troops were to be used exclusively with in the boundaries of Indian Territory and were not to be subject to service elsewhere.

The number of men to be raised varied among the tribes. The Creeks and Seminoles pledged a regiment of 10 companies; the Chickasaws and Choctaws were to furnish one regiment. The Cherokees not only agreed to the raising of one regiment, but also to the furnishing of two reserve companies. All of these troops were to be mounted, and their officers were to be elected from among the troops. The Confederacy was to assume the burden of equipping and paying the forces. These Indian troops were to be graded the same pay and allowances as all other Confederate forces. (p23)

The Confederacy next began to assimilate these forces into its military structure. The first military command of the Indian Territory was created on May 13, 1861, when Brigadier General Ben McCulloch was given the command of the district of Indian Territory... The nearly unanimous decision of the Federal Indian agents within Indian Territory to side with the Confederacy gave the self a nucleus on which to build inefficient agency system among the Five Civilized Tribes. (p24)

The Confederacy, by its own bureaucratic blundering and ineptness, failed to formulate a clear and concise program needed for the success of its efforts and Indian Territory. Had the South followed the suggestions of Pike's proposals, perhaps the confusion resulting from the attempts at creating an Indian policy would have been avoided. (p26)

Of all the civil functions promised in the Indian treaties, the one calling for the creation of a court system within Indian Territory was probably most widely hailed by the Indians. Because they had long experienced white man's laws as applied to the Indians on white man's ground, they were eager to have control over their own judicial system. ... These courts were to be regular district courts of the Confederacy with the exclusive power in criminal cases to try, condemned, and punish offenders who violated the law. They also were empowered to pronounce sentence and carryout execution. They were to exercise the same judicial power as any other district court system in the Confederacy. (p28)

The judiciary was given the full faith and credit of the judicial officers of the same grade and jurisdiction in any of the Confederate states. Thus was established for Indian Territory a workable judicial system based on the same rights and privileges as white citizens of the Confederacy, and on equal terms with other Southern states court systems.

... Extradition was provided not only among the Indian nations themselves, but also between the Indians and the other states of the Confederacy. These actions by the South of virtually ended all discrimination based on the Indian blood within the Confederate court system. ... Like the other civil services which the South attempted to establish inside Indian Territory, this one also failed.

... This inability of the Confederacy to fulfill his obligations to the Indians was blamed on the disturbed condition of the country. Whatever the reason, the question of the courts remained a course of dissatisfaction among the Indians throughout the war. ... The Indians were allowed to tax all licensed white traders of importing goods into Indian Territory. (p29)

To permit the Indians to participate fully in the government of the Confederacy, the Creeks and Seminoles were allowed jointly one representative in the House of Representatives. The Choctaws and Chickasaws were also allowed one representative to be elected alternately from either tribe, and the Cherokees were entitled to a single delegate. These representatives were to serve two year terms, had to be 21 years of age and under no legal disability. The Creek and Seminal delegate had to be a member of either nation. The Cherokee representative was required to be a native born citizen, and the Choctaw and Chickasaw member had to be a tribal member by birth either on the father's or mother's side. (p31)

The delegates were to ensure that the Indians would be able to secure the rights they were entitled to without the intervention of their agents. The delegates were allowed to propose in introduce measures for the benefit of the Indian nations. (p32)

Though the programs outlined for the country were well organized and developed, they were never adequately initiated and maintained. This difference in paper planning and actual execution was the result of many factors. Perhaps the most relevant of these was the continuing devastation of Indian Territory as the opposing armies in advanced and retreated across the country. The dislocation and confusion resulting from the military campaigns made it virtually impossible to establish a civil government with any degree of effectiveness. The Confederacy was hampered also by financial problems from the onset of the Civil War, and early in the conflict the money promised by the South became worthless. Apparently in its haste to gain the much desired Indian alliance, the Confederacy was guilty of promising much more than it could ever deliver. (p33)

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

White Southerners in the Civil Rights Movement


Professor David L. Chappell currently holds the Irene & Julian Rothbaum Professorship of American History at the University of Oklahoma. He has produced two works on American racial and civil rights history. I don’t like to rehash things already posted elsewhere but with constraints on my time, hopefully I can at least summarize in one paragraph what you might find across several other sites:

Inside Agitators: White Southerners in the Civil Rights Movement

One fascinating bit that did not make it into Inside Agitators was Chappell’s interview with C.P. Ellis, who was famous for renouncing his Klan membership in the 1970s. The interview apparently was similar to the one he did with Studs Terkel. Having known the feelings of power and solidarity that the Klan robe gave to a poor white man, Ellis told Chappell of how he began to understand and the African dashiki so popular in the 60s and 70s to the point where he wanted to wear one.

Chappell argues that moderate whites, though lacking a moral commitment to civil rights, played a key role in the movement's success at both the local and national levels. - Virginia Quarterly Review

Chappell explodes the convenient myth of the monolithic and homogeneous white South to reveal a society deeply divided over segregation. - Kari Frederickson, Southern Historian

A Stone of Hope: Prophetic Religion and the Death of Jim Crow

A Stone of Hope offers a refreshing reexamination of the American civil rights movement. Rather than being a victory of liberal ideals, the civil rights struggle owes its success to the Biblical prophetic tradition. Liberal politics offered a protracted “wait” and there was no guarantee of substantial, timely change. On the other hand, the potent message of Biblical themes was a catalyst and at the same time brought together divergent groups. More summary here…

http://uncpress.unc.edu/browse/book_detail?title_id=1054

Chappell has two forthcoming titles- Waking from the Dream: The Battle over Martin Luther King's Legacy, (which does NOT cover the current King estate battle by the way) and one I especially look forward to, The Mind of the Segregationist.

Friday, May 1, 2009

Southern and... Christian???


Read this story about Laurence Jones, a black educator from the early 20th century, who was miraculously delivered from a lynching in the South. The rope was around his neck, yet he was set free. Even if you don't read the rest of my post, go there and read the story now.

Many Southrons will claim "Christian" as a necessary element of Southern identity. But how much of it is genuine and how much  is racism disguised as hollow posturing? How many of these modern "southern Christians" would have spoken up for Laurence Jones?

Even up into the 1950s, whites would come out by the hundreds to watch a black man being lynched. It was a kind of twisted, demonic entertainment. Look for the photos on google. Those people were proud to be there. They smiled about it. Its sick. A lot of those people are still alive, aren't they? What whites stood up for justice? Where were (are) the whites with guts enough to be servants to the black community? You know, to be servants in the way Jesus commanded.

What should be the Southern response to the Black community? Well, if you're a real Christian it should be this...


  • But they held their peace: for by the way they had disputed among themselves, who should be the greatest. And he sat down, and called the twelve, and saith unto them, If any man desire to be first, the same shall be last of all, and servant of all. (Mark 9:34, 35)
  • But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant. And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted. (Matthew 23: 11-12)
  • Ye call me Master and Lord: and ye say well; for so I am. If I then, your Lord and Master, have washed your feet; ye also ought to wash one another's feet. For I have given you an example, that ye should do as I have done to you. (John 13:13-15)
There are no special exceptions in the case of Southerners. There are no exceptions in the event someone complains about the Confederate battle flag. If Southrons cannot live out what Jesus demands of his followers, if they cannot become servants to their Black neighbors, then they have brought upon the Confederate flag the reputation that history now gives it. And history has condemned it as a symbol of hate.

Ask yourself, where did the indignance come from? Why was it so important to be socially separate? Why was it so important to be angry at a people that never hurt you? Where is the gratitude that Southern whites owe the ancestors of African Americans for their contributions to the South?

I'm fortunate to come from a family that has tried to understand this. But the kind of spirituality that built the ancient church, that was born out of tears and fasting... THAT SAME spirituality has been lived out in African American Christianity to an extent that folks like me simply cannot comprehend. Searching for authentic Christianity will require more than just reading old books, it will require learning at the feet of people who lived the experience... and those people are closer than most realize. Can Southern people find the guts to become intimate with the elders in the Black community and make African American wisdom a part of their own spiritual life?

Wednesday, February 4, 2009

Confederate image in the hands of African Americans

You've heard the phrase "only Nixon could go to China". Well, maybe only African Americans can really take the lead in changing attitudes towards things Confederate. For example...

The Alfalfa Club is an exclusive Washington, D.C. social club founded in 1913 and its function was to celebrate the birthday of Confederate Civil War General Robert E. Lee. The club didn't admit blacks until the 1970s, and women until 1994.

On January 31st 2009, President Barack Obama spoke at the club's annual dinner saying "this dinner began almost one hundred years ago as a way to celebrate the birthday of General Robert E. Lee. If he were here with us tonight, the General would be 202 years old. And very confused." Read the story here...

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/01/alfalfa.obama/index.html?imw=Y&iref=mpstoryemail


A Southern historian posted a story on his blog about a Black chaplain in the Confederate forces that brought 1) Yankee and Southern soldiers together, and 2) "seasons of revival". The historian interviewed the chaplain's descendant, who is an African American and member in the Sons of Confederate Veterans. Read the entire post here on the Old Virginia blog:

http://oldvirginiablog.blogspot.com/2009/02/i-try-to-get-my-information-first-hand.html


ATLAH World Ministries, a predominantly African American church (pastored by the controversial James David Manning) is in the process of organizing the The Gettysburg Project. The purpose of the event is to give thanks for the deliverance from slavery, honor their ancestors that suffered and died due to slavery, and at the same time take a leadership role in racial reconciliation by holding the prayer event at the very place where thousands of Confederate soldiers died.


Project webpage: http://atlah.org/about/gettysburg.html

Watch the video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCKcddFacqg

South Carolina Sen. Robert Ford, an African American, wants to require local governments to observe both Confederate Memorial Day and Martin Luther King Day. The idea was for people in black and white communities to understand each other's history, to maybe understand each other a little better.

"I'm tired of all the bickering and the hatred and the fighting we do in South Carolina... We need to know what made Southern whites do what they did, secede from the Union and fight a four-year, bloody war."

Story here:
http://www.charleston.net/news/2009/feb/04/sen_ford_wants_holidays_observed70536/


Finally, this is really cool- the old Haunted Tank comic is back. The ghost of Confederate General JEB Stuart still haunts the tank, but this time the action takes place in Iraq, and the tank driver is African American. Thanks to Cenantua for bringing this to my attention.

http://cenantua.wordpress.com/2009/02/04/the-curious-evolution-of-the-haunted-tank/

Also, thanks to Campbell at the CSA Heritage blog for the pin graphic at the top
http://csaheritage.blogspot.com/

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Alexis De Tocqueville: neo-Confederate revisionist

So the Negro [in the North] is free, but he cannot share the rights, pleasures, labors, griefs, or even the tomb of him whose equal he has been declared; there is nowhere where he can meet him, neither in life nor in death. In the South, where slavery still exists, less trouble is taken to keep the Negro apart: they sometimes share the labors and the pleasures of the white men; people are prepared to mix with them to some extent; legislation is more harsh against them, but customs are more tolerant and gentle.

-Alexis De Tocqueville, "Democracy in America", Harper & Row, 1966, p.343.

Sunday, October 5, 2008

I wish I was in the land of Better Attitudes


Now this is one of those embarrassing racist things that always ruins it for the rest of us. I wish I was in the land of Better Lyrics. Look Away! Look Away! Quick!

Remember the old song "Dixie"? Someone entered an extensive history of the song "Dixie"on Wikipedia, complete with socio-political analysis. The lyrics we are familiar with may have racist undertones, right? But "undertones" won't matter when you see this. Here are lyrics printed in the Confederate Veteran magazine, June 1923, page 204 ...

O! Dixie's land is the land of glory, The land of cherished song and story. Look away, look away, look away, Dixie Land! The land where rules the Anglo-Saxon, The land of Davis, Lee, and Jackson. Look away, look away, look away, Dixie Land!

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Veterans- Black & White... and mutual respect

In the early 1900s, Confederate soldiers were respected within their community, some of them still wore their uniforms on occasion, even though it was against federal law. Authorities never did anything about it because these were old guys simply proud of their military service. Some veterans were responsible for the the Klan and Jim Crow, others of them advocated for the improvement of social conditions for African Americans. The point is, their War and their racial views were two different things.

Unlike the racist demonstrations of the 50s and 60s, many confederate veterans accepted their black compatriots as equal members. The horrors of war altered the mentality of these men and consequently, the white soldiers' views of African Americans as well. One of my ancestors spent two years in a POW camp... ALONGSIDE black confederate soldiers. There are photos of black and white confederate soldiers together at reunions. Unlike the North, their soldier's pay was the same. Also unlike the North, they marched together in parades. According to a foreign visitor to the U.S. ...

So the Negro [in the North] is free, but he cannot share the rights, pleasures, labors, griefs, or even the tomb of him whose equal he has been declared; there is nowhere where he can meet him, neither in life nor in death.

In the South, where slavery still exists, less trouble is taken to keep the Negro apart: they sometimes share the labors and the pleasures of the white men; people are prepared to mix with them to some extent; legislation is more harsh against them, but customs are more tolerant and gentle. -Alexis De Tocqueville, "Democracy in America", Harper & Row, 1966, p.343.

There is no question that the South deserved its racist reputation. But at the same time there were acts of kindness that crossed racial barriers, anti-slavery activism, and social support for former slaves- all on the part of native Southerners and Confederate veterans with the full understanding that racism damaged the moral and economic foundations of their home. The shame of it is that these important facts of history are conveniently ignored. Why? Because it is important to someone's politics that the South was about slavery, SO important that our educators willingly capitulate and go the extra mile to restrict students' access to certain historical facts. We must make sure our students graduate with an opinion that was predetermined for them. I appeal to anyone reading this to explain to me how this lack of academic integrity is justified.

Anecdote from a friend in Tennessee: it is the confederate descendants who are responsible for researching and finding lost African American cemeteries and placing grave markers. All this, but with no help because it is politically incorrect for NAACP to collaborate with confederate descendants on community projects, even when they are preserving and honoring African American heritage. I know, I have walked these once-lost graves myself.

The Confederate descendants' organization (SCV) has a strict policy against racist activity within its membership. The website of a Texas SCV chapter says:

... many SCV members are descendants of African-American, Catholic, Jewish, Native American, Hispanic, and Asian Confederates. The contributions of these groups to Southern culture have made it a beautiful and unique region. To deny their descendants membership in our organization would betray our principles and the very ancestors we honor.

From a Tennessee confederate website:

This site was created for true Southern Patriots to enjoy and learn about our history and heritage. Anyone belonging to tthe various hate groups, white supremacists or others who
demonstrate bigotry toward any race, creed or religion, are not welcome and forbidden to link to these pages.

We are True Southern Patriots and resent our symbols of Southern pride being musused and misrepresented by groups sush as he Ku Klux Klan, the American Nazi Party, and all others whose objectives are not for the remembrance of the South.

Organizations such as those listed above have done more to harm the Southern cause than any other group.

Thursday, July 24, 2008

A Southerner Against Jim Crow


Robert E. Lee's Daughter Arrested for solidarity with African Americans
. She sat in a train car reserved for Blacks and refused to move. From the Cleveland Gazette, June 21, 1902...

Points to remember:

  • She was the daughter of Robert E. Lee
  • This was consistent with the values of her father
  • The quote "assinine prejudice of 'chivalrous Southerners'"; uhh... she was Southern and she did something pretty chivalrous, disproving the implied stereotype.
  • Oh yeah... did I mention she was the daughter of Robert E. Lee?